Danilova's posts with tag: world war ii

What are tags? You can give your posts a "tag", which is like a keyword. Tags help you find content which has something in common. You can assign as many tags as you wish to each post.
LinkFirst Run Features: TrailersSep 19, '07 4:41 AM
for everyone
Link: http://firstrunfeatures.com/trailers.html

What I want for Christmas. I may not get world peace -- based on justice, but any of these DVDs will make me happy.

Blog EntryRacism Thrived in World War IIAug 29, '07 10:58 PM
for everyone

 

WARS do not occur in a vacuum. To a large part, they are based on the cultures of the countries at war.

 

World War II in the Pacific laid bare the inherent racism of Western colonizers. Racism thrived enough to ensure that in the United States and Britain, the Japanese were more hated than the Nazi Germans.

 

The Allied Forces played the race card to the hilt using many propaganda methods. They were goaded by a growing Chinese lobby and vocal American trade protectionist businessmen who feared the entry into the U.S. of inexpensive Japanese goods.

 

As time passed, the intense propaganda campaign eventually helped cajole the American public into a pro-war, anti-Japan position. By 1939, historian Michael C.C. Adams writes, polls showed that more Americans favored military aid to China rather then to Britain or France.

 

The Japanese had become the villain of choice for Westerners.

 

Writer John Dower notes that during that time, publications that regularly featured Japanese atrocities gave little coverage to the genocide of the Jews. In fact, the Holocaust was not even mentioned in the "Why We Fight" –the (film) series Frank Capra directed for the U.S. Army.

 

Dehumanizing the Enemy

 

Japanese soldiers –and sadly also all Japanese—were commonly referred to and depicted as subhuman: insects, monkeys, apes, rodents, or simply as barbarians who had to be wiped out or exterminated.

 

American Legion Magazine's cartoon of monkeys in a zoo who had posted a sign reading, "Any similarity between us and the Japs is purely coincidental" was typical.

 

In 1943, a U.S. Army poll found that roughly half of all GIs believed it would be necessary to kill every Japanese on earth before peace could be achieved. Their superiors appeared to agree. Generals like the Australian Sir Thomas Blamey informed his troops that, "Beneath the thin veneer of a few generations of civilization, (the Japanese) is a subhuman beast."

 

We all know Dr. Seuss as the genius who wrote The Cat in the Hat, Green Eggs and Ham, How the Grinch Stole Christmas and One Fish Two Fish Red Fish Blue Fish – the books that teach our children to read, and to love to read. But the esteemed doctor also had a darker side, depicting Japanese as half animal creatures in his political cartoons, done during World War II.

 

http://www.tfaoi.com/aa/1aa/1aa291.htm

 

 GOADED by the propaganda, by December 1943 there were more troops and equipment in the Pacific than in Europe. Historians have also estimated that as much as 1,589 artillery rounds were fired to kill each Japanese soldier.

 

As a December 1945 Fortune poll revealed, American feelings for the Japanese did not soften even after the war. Nearly 23 percent of those questioned wished the U.S. could have dropped "many more (atomic bombs) before the Japanese had a chance to surrender."

 

This virulent brand of genocidal hatred resulted from a massive public relations effort to demonize the enemy in the Pacific and thus justify anything in the name of victory. One good example is when the New York Times (the newspaper of record) ran an ad that showed a flamethrower being used to kill Japanese. The ad bore the headline:

"Clearing Out a Rat's Nest."

 

Race antagonisms and ignorance culminated in the Allied forces acting out their predetermined role in a self-fulfilling prophecy: If a subhuman will fight to death like an animal, those fighting on "the side of good" were simply left with no alternative but to slaughter them unmercifully. Since Japanese soldiers were under pressure not to surrender and were often killed when they did, this became a self-fulfilling prophesy.

 

General Blamey later told the New York Times: "Fighting Japs is not like fighting normal human beings. The Jap is a little barbarian… We are not dealing with humans as we know them. We are dealing with something primitive. Our troops have the right view of the Japs. They regard them as vermin." This was quoted by the Times on the front page.

 

 

Eugene B. Sledge, author of "With the Old Breed: At Peleliu and Okinawa," wrote of his comrades "harvesting gold teeth" from the enemy dead. In Okinawa, Sledge witnessed "the most repulsive thing I ever saw an American do in the war" –when a Marine officer stood over a Japanese corpse and urinated into its mouth.

 

Depiction of Japanese rat caught in a trap, from Josh newsletter, no. 12 by the Inter-Services Public Relations Directorate, India, April 1944

(LHCMA Heard collection)

 

HORROR STORIES about Japanese atrocities abounded, and these fueled further the animosity. A large part of the stories were true, too: Of the 235,473 U.S. and U.K. prisoners reported captured by Germany and Italy combined, only 4 percent (9,348) died. In contrast, an astonishing 27 percent of Japan's Anglo-American POWs (35,756 of 132,134) did not survive.

 

Indeed, with the Rape of Nanking, the Bataan Death March, and incidents such as the time when the marines on Guadalcanal were ambushed by Japanese soldiers pretending to surrender, the list of Japanese war crimes was long and did not have to be embellished to stir up Allied fury.

 

At the same time, the Japanese themselves wrestled with their own brand of racism. They felt superior, and believed that they were tasked with elevating the "Yamato race" the "pure race", the "leading race" –unique among the races and cultures of the world. They also believed that this uniqueness made them superior.

 

Certain visual images, such as the sun, sword, cherry blossom, snow-capped Mt. Fuji, and abstract "brightness" and auspicious colors like red and white, were used as symbols of the purity of the Japanese spirit. Such intense cultural fixations on the notion of purity and the self contributed to a wartime record of extremely harsh and brutal behavior toward non-Japanese.

 

Still, in many ways the behavior of Allied soldiers fighting the Japanese and even of those rooting for them back home was the anticipated outcome of the deadly campaign to manipulate the feelings against the Japanese. But while predictable, the results were no less appalling.

 

In April 1943, Dower reports about a American mother who had petitioned authorities to permit her son to mail her an ear he had cut off a Japanese soldier in the South Pacific. She wished to nail it in front of her door all to see.

 

Life magazine even printed a photo of this brutality in its May 22, 1943, issue, showing a young American woman with a boiled Japanese skull sent home to her by her boyfriend overseas.

 

A former war correspondent in the Pacific, Edgar L. Jones, put it best when he asked in the February 1946 Atlantic Monthly: "What Kind of war do civilians suppose we fought anyway? We shot prisoners in cold blood, wiped out hospitals, strafed lifeboats, killed or mistreated enemy civilians, finished off the enemy wounded, tossed the dying into a hole with the dead, and in the Pacific boiled flesh off enemy skulls to make table ornaments for sweethearts, or carved their bones into letter openers.

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/08/06/wjap06.xml&sSheet=/portal/2005/08/06/ixportal.html

 

Based on Myths

Even the official word was equally repugnant: Elliot Roosevelt, the president's son and confidant, told Henry Wallace in 1945 that America should bomb Japan "until we have destroyed about half the Japanese civilian population."

 

Paul V. McNutt, chairman of the War Manpower Commission, went a little further when he advocated to a public audience in April 1945 the "extermination of the Japanese in toto." Secretary of War Henry Stimson concurred, stating that, "to get on with Japan, one had to treat her rough, unlike other countries."

 

Because of these sentiments, U.S. bombers killed four to five times as many civilians in the last five months of the Pacific war than in three years of Allied bombing in Europe combined. And then there was the man who'd eventually give the order to drop the atomic bomb on Japanese civilians:

 

"We used (the bomb) against those who abandoned all pretense of obeying international laws of warfare," U.S. President Harry Truman later explained, justifying his decision to nuke people that he termed "savages, ruthless, merciless and fanatic."

 

Racist feelings were encouraged by three basic myths:

 

The "suicide psychology" involved the myth that since the fanatical Japanese would rather die than surrender, they "invited destruction."

 

The second rationalization had its roots in World War I and the treaty that ended it. "Anything less than a thoroughgoing defeat would be "incomplete" and invite the Japanese to use peace as a chance to prepare for war…as the Germans did between World War I and II.

 

Finally, there was the myth that Japan needed a "psychological purge," and that they needed to be castigated in the form of "great destruction and suffering." As Algar Hiss explained at the time, "( Japan's) entire national psychology (must) be radically modified."

 

Strangely, these premises are all inherently racist. Worse, these rationalizations are just too similar to those used for the extermination of Native Americans, or the enslavement of Africans in the 15th century, or even the slaughter of innocents in our very own Balangiga, by American colonizers at the turn of the 20th century.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Read more at:

http://www.ux1.eiu.edu/~cfib/courses/Fussell.pdf

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bugs_Bunny_Nips_the_Nips

 

Source: "There is No Good War: The Myths of World War II" (Vox Pop). Mickey Z. can be found on the Web at mickeyz.net.

 

 

 

 


Blog EntryNational Heroes DayAug 26, '07 8:24 PM
for everyone

Until today, in elementary and high school text books, there is no mention of the key role the 66th Infantry Battalion played in capturing Japanese General Tomoyuki Yamashita.

For sure, the general surrendered to the Americans. But who do you think captured him? Here's a humble tribute to an accidental hero.

....................................

By posting this in my blog, I hope I am not misunderstood as being anti-Japanese.

The Japanese-Igorot community contributed so much to the growth of Baguio and Benguet, and many members of that community continue to contribute to the region's struggle for self determination.

On a more personal note, my daughter loves Japanese anime and, frankly, looks like a Japanese anime character come to life! My younger brother, too, was really into Japanese Zen culture for the longest time.

Snow Falling Among Cedars is also one of the most beautiful movies I have watched.

 

 

 

 

 

 

To put to rest all doubts about this matter, my next post will be on how racism thrived during World War II-- and how the Japanese bore the brunt of this.

....................................

Remembering the late Dennis Molintas Sr.

(Major of the 66th Infantry Battalion, United States Forces in the Philippines-Northern Luzon, first governor of the old Mt. Province and of the newly-created Benguet Province in 1966, Filipino hero)

– By his grandson, Daniel R. Molintas.

IF OUR family has a measure of insanity, his “flavor” would be labeled these days as manic-obsessive.

MY GRANDFATHER, Dennis Molintas Sr., was obsessed with the abrupt, full scale, instantaneous north-to-south disruption of the Mountain Trail. His files on the movement of the 66 th Infanty Battalion, USFIL-NL movements in World War II (which eventually burned along with his house in 2003) indicate that he monitored enemy deployments and maneuvers on a weekly basis, even years before the actual days of reckoning. The same held true for enemy deployments in Lepanto and Mankayan, Benguet.

Yet, like all heroes, he made mistakes. My Lola says that Igorot troops defending the homeland had missed out the double-layered nature of the Lepanto pillboxes. And this cost them heavily. But he made up for such shortcomings with personal valor, and honor, and loyalty to his men. They felt this and reciprocated with personal loyalty to him.

Later in his retired years, he transferred this obsessiveness to cleanliness and orderliness. His house and garden in Betag, La Trinidad was the epitome of spic and span. Being at heart an agriculturist, a teacher and really just a reluctant hero—one of the first Ibalois sent by the American colonizers to the University of the Philippines in Los Baños to study—his garden was always in perfect order.

In fact, he was very much a conservationist and ecologist, way ahead of his time. He practiced organic farming in the 1960s, before it became the fad. When he spoke of the environment and ecology, he spoke with reverence. His contemporary ex-Baguio Mayor Virginia de Guia still voices the same sentiments.

Lolo Tatang was also a staunch guard of the old school, in terms of honor and integrity. When questioned by Daddy, the ever-rebellious son, as to why he did not bend the rules even a little, when in contrast, even army sergeants were amassing wealth, he replied: “I want you to be able to look at anyone STRAIGHT IN THE EYE.”

The old man Governor Alfredo G. Lamen (yes, the famous Lamen who walked up to Congress in g-string in response to Carlos P. Romulo’s declaration that Igorots were not Filipinos) who was his partner-in-office as Governor and Vice for the old Mountain Province acknowledged to me, when I met him, that honesty was lolo’s flaw. This is why he died a poor man.

SOME people today take Lolo to task for fighting against the Japanese, and for being harsh against enemy collaborators. They say he allowed the Igorots to fight a war that was not their own. World War II, they point out, was a colonizers’ scramble for power and resources.

But what these people do not take into consideration is that Lolo lived at a time where there was no instantaneous communication, there were few newspapers, and only a lot of whispered news of the Rape of Nanking (where some 300,000 Chinese people were raped and killed by Japanese soldiers, an event that remains a thorn in relations between China and Japan today), and of rapes and killings of fellow Filipinos in the lowlands. What they forget is that Japanese troops landed first on the shores of Lingayen Gulf—too close to Igorotlandia—and that the Filipinos were left by their Americans masters to fight off the Japanese invaders by themselves. And that the final battles against Japanese General Tomoyuki Yamashita were fought deep in the heart of Igorot lands.

Truly, he was more than just the product of his times. And he was not just an “American boy” that the today’s leftists would view him as. For sure, he was more broadminded than a mere American puppet.

Lolo fought the Japanese, but he tried to understand their culture. He had a book on Japanese culture. This attempt to see things in a broader view is, indeed, heroic, when seen in the context of what he personally had to go through during World War II: He was hunted by the Japanese, his father was tortured by Japanese soldiers, his aunt went insane because of psy-war (she was tied to a burning hut, but let free), and he had to see the two captured American Colonels who had appointed him—Arthur Noble and Martin Moses—executed by beheading in full public view at the Baguio Plaza.

He tried to understand the war, even while it was still going on. Among his files I found scholarly British texts on the diplomatic origins of World War I, a book by Lord John Maynard Keynes explaining the economic causes of World War II, novels by a Jewish-Austrian exile, and others. Clearly, something not to be expected from a man of “action”. In these too, we see that Lolo was truly a great man.

THROUGH the years and across the states of conciousness, Lolo’s hand reaches out to bless me. As the eldest male of our family, I have not inherited any sort of material wealth from him. But my Lolo did hand down to me a great legacy: the value of education, of books and of pure learning. And the understanding—that in the midst of the outrageousness of life and of the cynicism of modern times—some things, like honesty and valor, have to be absolute and untransactionable.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanking_Massacre

http://cpcabrisbane.org/Kasama/1997/V11n3/Henson.htm


© 2008 Multiply, Inc.    About · Blog · Terms · Privacy · Corp Info · Contact Us · Help